Driving under suspicion of DUI can be overwhelming and confusing. You may feel unsure about what to expect or how to protect yourself, especially when it comes to interpreting your rights during a traffic stop. Reasonable suspicion refers to a justified belief that a driver may be committing a crime, such as driving under the influence.
In this blog, we’ll explain reasonable suspicion, the circumstances that lead to a DUI stop, and how officers determine if a stop is justified. To learn more about your rights and how we can help you manage legal challenges, visit McAdams Law Office.
Law enforcement officers can’t pull you over without a legitimate reason. In DUI cases, police typically initiate traffic stops based on a set of observable behaviors or driving patterns that suggest impairment. These are some of the most common causes of DUI stops in Colorado:
These behaviors can prompt law enforcement to pull a driver over for suspicion of DUI.
So, what is reasonable suspicion for a DUI stop? Essentially, it is the legal standard that allows law enforcement to initiate a traffic stop if they have a specific, articulable reason to believe a driver may be committing a crime, such as driving under the influence (DUI). It’s a lower standard than “probable cause,” but it must still be based on observable facts.
Also, it is a crucial element in DUI stops because it helps safeguard individuals from arbitrary or unjustified stops. Officers must be able to point to specific driving behaviors or circumstances that suggest a driver may be impaired before pulling them over.
There are various behaviors that can give police reasonable suspicion to conduct a DUI stop. Some of these include:
Officers are trained to recognize these attitudes, and they use them to justify pulling a driver over for concern of DUI. For more details on how officers determine reasonable suspicion in DUI stops, check this guide.
No, they are not the same. Reasonable suspicion allows an officer to stop and question a driver if they have a specific reason to believe the person may be involved in illegal activity, such as DUI. However, probable cause is a higher standard and is required for an officer to make an arrest, meaning they must have enough evidence to believe a crime has been committed. It could arise during the traffic stop if the officer notices signs of impairment, such as slurred speech, the smell of alcohol, the failure of a field sobriety test, or other indicators of intoxication. This higher legal standard must be met before any formal charges can be brought against you. It’s fundamental to know your rights in such situations.
For more details on the legal distinction between these two standards in DUI cases, visit Colorado DUI laws.
¨We’re not just a business in Weld County; we’re a part of the community. Living and working here, we’re dedicated to supporting the people of Greeley. Our office is right by the courthouse, deep in the heart of the local legal scene. With over 140 jury trials in 20 years, our experienced attorneys understand that everyone deserves respect and a strong defense, no matter the situation¨
Officers rely on specific behaviors and circumstances to establish a grounded belief during DUI stops. These may include:
Law enforcement must base their decision to stop a vehicle on specific and observable actions rather than a vague assumption. Colorado’s Express Consent Law also plays a role, requiring all drivers to submit to chemical testing if lawfully arrested for DUI.
In the state, the concept of reasonable suspicion is closely tied to the Fourth Amendment, which protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures. This means that before an officer can stop a driver, they must have grounded belief based on observed behavior.
If an officer cannot establish reasonable suspicion, then any evidence obtained during the traffic stop—such as breathalyzer results or field sobriety test performance—could potentially be ruled inadmissible in court. Understanding these legal standards is crucial if you’re facing DUI charges, as they form the foundation of a strong defense strategy.
If you believe you were stopped without reasonable suspicion, you may have grounds to challenge the legality of the stop in court. A skilled DUI attorney can examine the details of your case, including police reports and dashcam footage, to determine whether the officer had sufficient grounds to pull you over.
Challenging the reasonable suspicion for your DUI stop could lead to crucial evidence being excluded, potentially resulting in the dismissal of your charges. To learn more about the DUI process and what to expect following an arrest, visit the Colorado DMV’s DUI process page for detailed guidance.
If you have been pulled over under suspicion of DUI, it’s crucial to understand your rights and take action to protect them. At McAdams Law Office, we specialize in handling DUI cases, guaranteeing your legal rights are upheld throughout the process. Our experienced attorneys can help challenge any unwarranted actions by law enforcement and guide you through each step of your case. Contact us today to schedule a consultation and begin building a solid defense.
DUI/DWAI Victories | Criminal Defense Wins |
---|---|
People v. S.M.Two DUIs downgraded to DWAI, |
People v. M.J.Assault and child abuse charges |
People v. S.D.DUI dismissed, pled to |
People v. S.C.Theft charge dropped, |
People v. B.S.Breath test challenged, |
People v. A.E.Drug charges dismissed, |
People v. E.B.No jail, favorable plea despite |
People v. J.K.Burglary plea reduced, |
People v. R.G.One DWAI dismissed, another reduced with minimal work release. |
People v. C.R.Traffic offense reduced, |
William T. McAdams, known as Bill, is a highly experienced criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor. Since establishing McAdams Law Office in 2006, he has represented clients in cases including DUI, domestic violence, and theft, handling over 100 jury trials. Bill serves clients predominantly in Weld and Larimer counties, including Greeley, Evans, Windsor, Loveland, and Fort Collins. An active community volunteer and member of multiple legal associations, he is dedicated to protecting his clients’ rights.
This page has been written, edited, and reviewed by a team of legal writers following our comprehensive editorial guidelines. This page was approved by Founding Partiner, William McAdams who has more than 25 years of legal experience as a personal injury attorney.