Evidence Needed for DUI Conviction in Greeley, Colorado

click for free consultation

Evidence Needed for DUI Conviction in Greeley, Colorado

click for free consultation
Posted By William McAdams | March 19 2025 | DUI

Driving under the influence (DUI) is a critical offense punishable by grave legal and financial liabilities in Greeley, Colorado. Upon being charged with DUI or in the process of learning the legal regulations, it becomes crucial to know what evidence needed for a DUI conviction.  Our attorneys at McAdams Law Office are ready to offer guidance, support, and knowledge of what prosecutors rely on, how they build their cases, and how defense attorneys fight those claims.  

Contact a DUI & Criminal Defense Lawyer

Understanding DUI Charges in Colorado

Under Colorado Revised Statutes Section 42-4-1301, a person can be charged with Driving Under the Influence (DUI) if they drive while impaired by alcohol, drugs, or a combination of both so that, to some appreciable degree, their ability to drive is adversely affected. Driving while Ability Impaired (DWAI) applies a lesser standard where a lesser charge applies when an impairment can be noticed, yet not to the full extent that one would raise toward the serious charge of DUI.

Key Types of Evidence in a DUI Case

In order to convict an individual in a charge of driving under the influence, there are various pieces of evidence needed for a DUI conviction that the prosecution may offer. This commonly refers to:

Field Sobriety Test Results

Field Sobriety Tests (FSTs) are exercises used by officers to assess impairment and are not considered completely reliable. Common examples include:

  • Walk-and-Turn: Evaluates for balance and the ability to follow instructions.
  • One-Leg Stand: Assesses for coordination and concentration.
  • Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN): Observation of involuntary eye movements correlating with alcohol intoxication.

Breathalyzer or Blood Test Results

Colorado’s “express consent” law means that by driving, you automatically agree to a chemical test (breath, blood, or urine) if suspected of DUI. Here’s how the results are used: 

  • Blood Alcohol Content (BAC) 0.08% and higher usually results in a DUI charge. 
  • BAC below 0.08% can still lead to a DWAI charge if an impairment is established.

Officer Observations and Testimony

An officer’s account of your behavior while driving significantly establishes impairment. Many DUI cases cite:

  • The smell of alcohol or marijuana 
  • Slurred speech or unsteady posture 
  • Swerve or erratic driving before a traffic stop.

Dashcam or Bodycam Footage

Dashboard cameras used in law enforcement can provide a valid and objective picture of what the driver was doing at that time.

Witness Testimony

If there are passengers or third-party witnesses, their testimonies may be used to corroborate or challenge the officer’s observations. Witnesses may testify about the driver’s behavior before, during, or after the incident.

How Prosecutors Use Evidence in DUI Convictions

Prosecutors use each type of evidence described above in constructing their case. Among these would be:

  • Erratic driving was allegedly observed by an officer, who corroborated this with dashcam video footage.
  • Failed breathalyzer results may strengthen claims of impairment.
  • Additional corroboration regarding the officer’s testimony of slurred speech and imbalance.

Challenging Evidence in a DUI Case

While the prosecution may seem to have the upper hand, there are several ways a skilled DUI attorney can challenge the evidence:

Issues with Testing Procedures

If breathalyzers or blood testing equipment were improperly maintained or calibrated, the test results might be deemed unreliable. Additionally, questions about the chain of custody for blood or urine samples can lead to evidence dismissal.

Unreliable Field Sobriety Tests

Given the subjective nature of field sobriety tests, attorneys can argue that external factors such as uneven surfaces, poor lighting, or medical conditions influenced the test results. Studies have shown these tests are not always accurate in gauging impairment.

Disputing Officer Observations

Bodycam or dashcam footage can counter an officer’s subjective observations. For example:

  • Clear speech or steady walking may refute claims of slurred speech or imbalance.
  • Recorded interactions could demonstrate respectful, coherent behavior by the suspect.

What Happens If Evidence Is Insufficient?

In the absence of sufficient evidence against the prosecution, the case may even be dismissed or the charges reduced to another penal offense, such as reckless driving. However, a lack of evidence does not necessarily amount to dismissal; it may create more favorable circumstances for plea negotiations. 

When to Seek Legal Representation for a DUI Charge

DUI charges can be overwhelming, but you don’t have to face them alone. A skilled DUI attorney meticulously reviews your case, challenges weak evidence, and fights for the best possible outcome. At McAdams Law Office, we specialize in DUI defense in Greeley, Colorado, carefully analyzing every detail to identify flaws in tests, procedural errors, and violations of your rights. We understand the evidence needed for a DUI conviction and leverage our expertise to build a strong defense on your behalf.

Schedule a Free Consultation Today

Take the first step towards protecting your future. Visit us at 822 7th Street, Suite 530, Greeley, CO 80631, or call (970) 353-0000 to schedule your consultation.

DUI/DWAI Victories Criminal Defense Wins

People v. S.M.

Two DUIs downgraded to DWAI,
avoided jail.

People v. M.J.

Assault and child abuse charges
dismissed, evidence issues.

People v. S.D.

DUI dismissed, pled to
Reckless Driving.

People v. S.C.

Theft charge dropped,
quick jury decision.

People v. B.S.

Breath test challenged,
DUI reduced to DWAI.

People v. A.E.

Drug charges dismissed,
validated medical use.

People v. E.B.

No jail, favorable plea despite
three priors.

People v. J.K.

Burglary plea reduced,
avoided severe penalty.

People v. R.G.

One DWAI dismissed, another reduced with minimal work release.

People v. C.R.

Traffic offense reduced,
license saved.

Request Free Consultation

  • *required fields
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
#

This page has been written, edited, and reviewed by a team of legal writers following our comprehensive editorial guidelines. This page was approved by Founding Partiner, William McAdams who has more than 25 years of legal experience as a personal injury attorney.